Transactions to acquire large companies often simultaneously affect entities located in several jurisdictions.
By way of example: a controlling stake in a foreign company is being acquired. However, that foreign company has a subsidiary in Belarus. In such a case it is necessary to assess whether the consent of the Belarusian antimonopoly authority — the Ministry of Antimonopoly Regulation and Trade (hereinafter, “MART”) — is required for such an acquisition, notwithstanding that the principal asset being acquired is shares in a foreign company.
Certain actions in Belarus are recognised as an “economic concentration” (for example, the acquisition of shares/participatory interests, reorganisations, etc.).
Carrying out an act of economic concentration, subject to certain conditions, may require:
In the context of cross-border transactions, a frequently encountered act of economic concentration is the “acquisition of rights enabling one to give instructions that are binding on another commercial organisation in the course of its entrepreneurial activity” (hereinafter, the “acquisition of rights of control”).
The legislation does not define what is meant by “acquisition of rights of control”. In practice, however, this is understood to include, for example, the acquisition of rights enabling one to:
Acquiring a controlling stake in a foreign company often makes it possible to “indirectly” control the taking of such decisions in respect of its subsidiary.
It is also important to note that Belarusian competition (antimonopoly) law may apply extraterritorially, i.e., to actions carried out outside Belarus. The extraterritorial principle applies in cases where, outside Belarus:
Accordingly, for the extraterritorial application of the requirement to obtain MART consent, it is sufficient that such actions have, or may have, an effect on a company registered in Belarus.
The acquisition of rights of control is undertaken with MART consent where any one of the following conditions is met:
If the acquisition of rights of control is carried out without obtaining MART consent, adverse consequences for the entire transaction may follow (for example, the transaction may be declared invalid or administrative liability may be imposed).
Accordingly, be vigilant: even if the principal asset being acquired is not a Belarusian company, obtaining MART consent may still be required.
If you have questions about whether MART consent or notification is necessary, we can help you work this out.
Author: Iryna Andryieuskaya.