“Sweet” case

REVERA helped the client to overcome the challenges of trademark registration in Belarus.

A Belarusian manufacturer of confectionery goods filed an objection with the Board of Appeals of the National Centre for Intellectual Property against granting legal protection in Belarus for the trademark of REVERA’s client – a Russian confectionery factory.  

In its claim, the Belarusian manufacturer pointed to the confusing similarity of the designations, brand awareness on the Belarusian market in relation to its products, as well as the earlier date of registration of their trademark. In addition, it was noted that the Russian competitor actually uses the designation not in the form in which it is registered.

The Board of Appeals rejected the Belarusian manufacturer’s objection, which was followed by an appeal of the decision to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus.

REVERA lawyers managed to prove that the designations of the Belarusian manufacturer and the Russian factory have a sufficient level of distinction and are not confusingly similar, and that the issues and variants of use of the designations are not the subject of the dispute.

The peculiarity of the case was that the trademark had been a well-known brand of sweets in the times of the Soviet Union. Issues with the registration of Soviet brands have already been the subject of disputes on numerous occasions, including in court, and therefore the registration of a Soviet brand does not always give the expected result and grant exclusive rights.

As a result, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus agreed with the arguments of REVERA experts and kept the decision of the Board of Appeals in effect, refusing to satisfy the complaint of the Belarusian manufacturer.
 

Similar projects

REVERA law group case: protecting copyright against bad-faith trade mark registration
REVERA law group lawyers represented the interests of the client — a resident of the Republic of Belarus engaged in the sale of large and small-sized electric transport. The copyright protection dispute was considered by the Appeal Board of the National Centre of Intellectual Property (NCIP) within the procedure for challenging the legal protection of a trade mark out of court.
AI legal compliance: webinars for the employees
REVERA Arbitration & IT Disputes team assisted group with offices across the EU, CIS, and other jurisdictions approached REVERA to establish compliant internal processes with the use of AI. The client required guidance on regulatory requirements across various territories for AI content creation and implementation in HR, PR, and other departments, as well REVERA law group also to provide the company with a comprehensive overview of current AI regulation across multiple jurisdictions, conduct detailed analysis of regulatory requirements for various business activities within the group, and separately examine copyright issues for AI-generated content including code, graphics, characters, text materials, promotional videos, and other outputs.
“Sweet” case
REVERA team defended the trademark rights of a major player of the Russian confectionery industry at Chamber for Intellectual Property Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus in relation to a famous brand of sweets coming from the USSR.
Write to us









    Send request