International Construction Arbitration: Protecting the Client’s Interests in an Amount Exceeding EUR 30 Million
REVERA provided comprehensive legal support to a major company implementing turnkey projects in the mining and metallurgical as well as mining industries in the CIS and beyond, within the framework of a dispute before the International Arbitration Court at the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (IAC at the BCCI) against a major customer, a resident of Uzbekistan.
A project with an implementation value exceeding EUR 300 million became the subject of a dispute in an amount exceeding EUR 30 million. The case was considered under Uzbek law, while the seat of arbitration was Minsk, which immediately created a number of cross-border and conflict-of-laws challenges.
Debt Recovery in Belarus Based on a Russian Court Decision
REVERA successfully secured the full recovery of a debt in Belarus based on a Russian arbitral court decision after the debtor violated an approved installment plan. The team managed the entire enforcement process, ensuring the client received all awarded funds.
Debt recovery from a Cypriot company in international arbitration
REVERA achieved the recovery of a debt from a Cypriot company in international arbitration. Despite the absence of conventional documentary evidence, the team substantiated the performance of services and secured a favorable award for the client in under seven months.
“Sweet” case
REVERA team defended the trademark rights of a major player of the Russian confectionery industry at Chamber for Intellectual Property Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus in relation to a famous brand of sweets coming from the USSR.
REVERA law group case: protecting copyright against bad-faith trade mark registration
REVERA law group lawyers represented the interests of the client — a resident of the Republic of Belarus engaged in the sale of large and small-sized electric transport. The copyright protection dispute was considered by the Appeal Board of the National Centre of Intellectual Property (NCIP) within the procedure for challenging the legal protection of a trade mark out of court.
