In importers’ practice, situations sometimes arise when the customs authorities increase the declared customs value of goods. This leads to an increase in mandatory payments (VAT, customs duties) and affects the economic indicators of the import operation. However, such an increase can be successfully challenged if proper justification is provided.
We carried out legal and documentary analysis, examining the position of the customs authority.
Our conclusion: there were sufficient legal grounds for applying the method declared by the company — the transaction value of the imported goods.
We prepared a complete set of documents demonstrating the market level of prices:
We submitted to the customs authority a detailed, substantiated objection (9 pages) in which we not only proved the legality of the declared method but also demonstrated the economic unreasonableness of the value proposed by the customs authority.
An important argument: We pointed out that the customs authority used data outside the period of relevance established by the EAEU legislation.
The customs authority decided to release the goods in accordance with the originally declared value.
This case illustrates that a balanced professional approach, knowledge of technical nuances and thorough preparation make it possible to effectively protect business interests in dialogue with regulatory and enforcement authorities.
REVERA is ready to provide expert support on issues concerning the determination and defence of customs value.
Author: Mikhail Dzenisiuk.